ManagedQA PartnersSee plans

Situation

An enterprise customer sent a security questionnaire

The testing section asks how releases are tested, who signs off, how findings are tracked and how often. The true answer today may be short. It can be a better answer in a month.

Termsverdict (a one-word release result (pass, pass with findings, fail) with the findings and the checklist version behind it) · two-user test (sign in as one user, create a row, then try to read or change it as another user; pass is nothing comes back) · webhook (a message a provider such as Stripe sends to your server when something happens, like a payment) · fault injection (making a dependency fail on purpose in staging to see what the user and the logs show) · CI (the pipeline that builds and tests every change before it can be merged or deployed) · protected branch (the git branch that cannot be pushed to directly and is the only source of production deploys) · migration (a scripted change to the database schema that ships with a release and should be reversible) · store sandbox (Apple's and Google's test environments where purchases run without real money) · LLM feature (a product feature that calls a large language model, such as an assistant or a summariser)

The situation

Questionnaires ask for process, not promises: a documented release procedure, evidence it runs, severity classification, and how long a critical finding takes to reach a person. A published checklist with pass criteria, a verdict per release and a monthly report answer those questions with documents you can attach.

What to do this week

An ordered sequence from the checklist. Each item links to its pass criterion.

  1. Day 1

    Adopt the published checklist as the release procedure and start recording the version and verdict on every release. The questionnaire can cite the checklist URL.

    • DR-05Release notes carry the checklist version and verdictlow
  2. Day 2

    Run the items questionnaires ask about by name: secrets scanning on history, security headers, rate limiting on login.

    • SC-02No secrets in repository historycritical
    • SC-05Security headers present on production responsesmedium
    • AU-04Login and code-entry endpoints are rate-limited with a lockout rulehigh
  3. Day 3

    Run the access control and CSRF items and keep the output; 'tested as another user' is a sentence reviewers look for.

    • AC-02Policies deny cross-tenant reads and writes when tested as another usercritical
    • AC-03Object access checks ownership, not only logincritical
    • AU-05State-changing requests are protected against cross-site request forgeryhigh
  4. Day 4

    Rehearse rollback and verify a backup restores. Recovery questions are in every questionnaire.

    • DR-02Rollback rehearsed on the previous releasehigh
    • DM-02Destructive changes are gated behind a verified backupcritical
  5. Day 5

    Confirm error responses carry no internal detail, then write the answers with the release record and the sample report format attached.

    • EH-03Error responses contain no internal detailmedium

Which plan

Growth $5,900/mo

Growth for a team of 8-15 with an API, which is where enterprise questionnaires usually arrive. The monthly report is the document you forward.

Limits, inclusions and what is not included.

Email about Growth

What happens without it

In July 2025 a platform's register and verify-otp endpoints accepted unauthenticated calls, and because app ids were visible in manifests, anyone could create a verified account on private enterprise applications. The fix took a day; the questionnaire answer 'protected routes verify the session server-side and auth endpoints cannot be used out of order' (AU-01, AU-03) is what a customer wants to see was true before they asked.

Two authentication endpoints (register and verify-otp) on a prompt-to-app platform accepted requests without authentication; because app ids were visible in manifests, anyone could register a verified account on private enterprise applications. Reported 9 July 2025, fixed within 24 hours.

Source: Wiz Research, 2025-07-29 · verified 2026-09-21

Questions

Enterprise security questionnaire testing section
Answer with documents: the release procedure (the checklist URL and version), evidence it runs (a release record with verdicts), severity definitions (on the checklist page), escalation time for a critical finding (4 business hours on every plan), and the monthly report format. Say what is not covered: no penetration test, no attestation.
How to answer security questionnaire testing questions?
State the process, name the version, attach a record, and be exact about scope. Reviewers score specificity over adjectives. 'Every release is tested against release checklist v1.0; the last verdict is attached; critical findings reach the named contact within 4 business hours' is a full answer.
Secure SDLC questionnaire answers small company
A small team can answer honestly and well: reviewed pull requests, a published release checklist run on every release, secrets scanning in CI, a rehearsed rollback, and a named person who signs the verdict. What you cannot claim (certified penetration testing, attestations) you say you cannot claim.

Start with the audit

5 business days, $1,200, credited to the first month.

Start with the auditRead the checklist