ManagedQA PartnersSee plans

Team hubs

QA by the tool your team writes with

What each tool changes in a codebase, read from its docs with dates; the failure patterns most associated; how the checklist adapts; which plan fits.

  • Anysphere

    QA for teams writing with Cursor

    Cursor's Agent edits files and runs commands on the developer's machine. The code it produces needs the same release checks as any other; the run modes decide how much of that has to happen in CI instead of the editor.

    5 verified defaults

  • GitHub

    QA for teams writing with GitHub Copilot

    Copilot completes code in the editor and, as a cloud agent, opens pull requests from its own branches in a GitHub Actions environment. The platform enforces a second reviewer; the checklist is what that reviewer runs.

    5 verified defaults

  • Anthropic

    QA for teams writing with Claude Code

    Claude Code runs in the terminal with a permission system: read-only by default, approval for edits and commands, and settings files that enforce deny rules. What it cannot enforce is whether the release passes.

    5 verified defaults

  • Cognition

    QA for teams writing with Windsurf

    Windsurf's Cascade agent edits the codebase and runs commands under auto-execution levels from manual approval to Turbo mode. The docs now live under Devin Desktop; the release checks are the same.

    5 verified defaults

  • Lovable

    From a Lovable app to production

    Lovable generates the front end and connects it to a Supabase project you own. Its publish scan lints row-level security policies. What it does not do is run the two-user test, check payments, or watch the release after the first one.

    5 verified defaults

  • StackBlitz

    From a Bolt app to production

    Bolt builds the app, hosts it or publishes to Netlify, and offers a security audit from the Publish menu that covers secrets, access control, input validation and authentication. It runs when you run it.

    5 verified defaults